What Might Healthy Open Source Look Like?
This talk by Sumana Harihareswara is an expansive re-imagining of both open source development and the kind of society that could support it.
Something that is free and open source (FOSS) is made freely available for possible modification and redistribution. It stands in contrast to how many goods are made - with labor funded by private capital and protected as intellectual property.
In talking about open source, we grapple with fundamental questions of “how should we make stuff”? Who decides what gets made? Who owns it? Who are the stakeholders and how are they involved? What does ownership mean - is it public, part of a commons, something else? Is it made by a group or is a single person behind it? How does work start, continue or end? How is it divided up? Who gets credit? Who pays or gets paid? What values should guide our work? These questions can lead to a radical rethink of work. Or it can just mirror or support what’s currently happening with a few practical modifications. Or it can be a mix. In light of reckoning over the resignation and then controversial reinstatement of free software founder Richard Stallman from the Free Software Foundation, this is an exploration via tech, design, and ideological perspectives of what open source is and could be.
This talk by Sumana Harihareswara is an expansive re-imagining of both open source development and the kind of society that could support it.
WikiHouse and Jumpsuit demonstrate new ways of working in the traditional design fields of architecture and fashion.
Members of tech services co-op Agaric share what open source software they use and why in their daily operation.
Coming out of a live event in Berlin, Germany called DWebDesign #3, this post is a great introduction and link collection for digital designers interested in learning more about open source.
Libre Graphics Club, Libre Graphics Meeting, and Libre Graphics Magazine are some resources, present and past, for designers looking to explore open source tools.
Open source was meant to be a commons, or a shared marketplace with resources that belong to — and benefit — its community as a whole. In a few important ways, it’s failed to achieve that. But that doesn’t mean it’s too late.
An incisive analysis of free software and open-source software's shortcomings and a nice summary of the post open-source tendencies emerging.
Ethical Source takes issue with Principle Zero of Free Software, "The freedom to run the program, for any purpose" and instead insists that ethics must be taken into account with the creation, design and use of technology.
Long time free software proponents Molly de Blanc and Karen M. Sandler pen a declaration outlining an updated set of principles for technology that is empowering, not oppressive.
The Cooperative Technology Movement believes the downfall of the free/open-source movement is its unwillingness to critique capitalism. As a result, open source has been coopted by tech giants.